Please use this template (4 to 6 pages ONLY)
All Accepted peer-reviewed papers will be published in proceeding or journal indexed by Scopus.
The International Conference on Psychology, Humanities and Social Sciences (ICPHS2022) aims to bring together leading academic scientists, professors, researchers, students and research scholars to exchange and share their experiences and research results about all aspects of Humanities, Psychology and Social Sciences. It also provides the premier interdisciplinary forum for researchers, practitioners and educators to present and discuss the most recent innovations, trends, and concerns, practical challenges encountered and the solutions adopted in the field of Humanities, Psychology, Social Sciences and Laws. In this conference you will find a great and friendly community of multinational researchers who are found of sharing their common experiences.
Track 1: Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Cultural Psychology
- Legal Psychology
- Industrial Psychology
- Organizational Psychology
- Management Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Health Psychology
- Social Psychology
- General Psychology
- Sport Psychology
- Political Psychology
- Military Psychology
- Consumer Psychology
Track 2: Social Sciences and Humanities
- Linguistics and Literature
- Knowledge and Information Science
- Social History
- Regional Development Planning
- Tourism Planning
- Social Welfare Planning
Track 3: Global Political Strategy and Laws
- International Relations
- Politics, Governance and Strategic Studies
- Public Laws
- Private & Commercial Laws
- Technology, Innovation and General Laws
Peer Review Process
All submitted full papers will be peer reviewed. The acceptance will be granted if the recommendations from the reviewers are positive. The criteria are based on the technical contents, clarity and format. Authors should make sure the submitted papers use the template for this conference. There are three review processes: Initial Review, Peer Review and Recommendation.
The track director evaluates each manuscript in the submission track to determine if its topic and content is suitable for consideration for the conference before being reviewed. Manuscripts that do not meet minimum criteria are returned to the authors. This is in the best interest of the authors who could then decide to either correct the problems or to submit the manuscript to a more appropriate venue, avoiding delays from a lengthy review process that would nonetheless lead to rejection.
Manuscripts that pass the initial review by the Track Directors, will be sent to several referees based on their expertise. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two referees. The referees are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, soundness of methodology, impact to design research, and relevance to design practices. To facilitate timely publication, referees are asked to complete their reviews and provide individual critiques within two weeks. After collecting the referees' reports, the Track Director makes a recommendation on the acceptability of the manuscript.
Based on the referees' comments, the Track Director makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees' reports. The status reports to reviewers should identify the reviewers of each paper, the final decision can be "Accept Submission", "Revisions Required", or "Decline Submission." The revised version should be submitted considering the review comments. The revision summary (response to the reviewers's comments) must be attached.
The authors should make sure that the manuscript pass a criterion of maximum 30 percents similarities to other publications.